Legal Topics

Allahabad High Court expresses displeasure at the Centre for now not appointing presiding officers for tribunals

The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court expressed sturdy displeasure at the Central authorities over the non-appointment of presiding officers in a variety of debt healing tribunals and debt healing appellate tribunals for a lengthy time.

A single-judge bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh exceeded this order whilst listening to a petition filed utilizing Canara Bank/Assets Recovery Mgmt Branch, Lko Thru Chief Manager Ajeet Kumar Srivastava.

In this petition, the petitioner has approached the Court in opposition to the orders dated January 19, 2022, and January 03, 2022, surpassed by using Debt Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow.

The occasion to method the Court without delay in writ jurisdiction has arisen due to the fact of preserving the publish of Presiding Officer/Chairman of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal has been vacant for extra than three months.

The Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 offers for the institution of Debt Recovery Tribunal/Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal for the reason of adjudicating the disputes for restoration etc, of the mortgage superior by using the monetary institutions. For the stated purposes, the tribunals and appellate tribunals have been set up and adjudicatory mechanisms have been supplied underneath the Act and guidelines framed thereunder.

The Court said, “It is unlucky that after growing mechanism and adjudicatory forums, for some months and in some instances years, the posts of Presiding Officer/Chairman are saved vacant and the litigants have to come to the Court. This will increase the burden of the High Court unnecessarily. If the Government is unable to appoint equipped individuals as Presiding Officers/Chairmen in DRTs /DRATs, then it is higher than this enactment is scrapped and the tribunals are abolished.”

The Court sought a response from the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India on what is stopping the Government from appointing Presiding Officers/Chairmen in DRTs/DRATs, which are vacant for numerous months in the country.

“Let a splendid response be filed inside a length of two weeks utilizing the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. Till the subsequent date of record of the petitions, respondents are directed to hold reputation quo in admiration of the houses in question. List after two weeks,” the Court ordered.

Leave a Reply